President Donald Trump has announced plans to label violence against Tesla dealerships as domestic terrorism, in a move that signals deepening ties with Elon Musk, the CEO of the electric vehicle manufacturer. The decision comes as protests, dubbed "Tesla Takeovers," have been erupting across the globe, with some instances resulting in vandalism, arson, and even Molotov cocktails being thrown at dealership properties.

The protests are largely seen as a response to Musk's perceived influence over the federal government, particularly through his role as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an advisory committee established by Trump in January. DOGE has been instrumental in implementing widespread layoffs of government workers and the removal of entire agencies, such as USAID, sparking widespread anger, fear, and confusion.

Tesla's stock price has taken a significant hit in recent months, falling below its peak after Trump's presidential election victory in November 2024. The company's sales have also nosedived globally, with the brand suffering from Musk's political exploits. Trump's move to label violence against Tesla dealerships as domestic terrorism is seen as an attempt to stem the tide of negative sentiment surrounding the company.

According to federal law, an attack on company property can be considered domestic terrorism if the intent is to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence government policy, or affect government conduct through destruction, assassination, or kidnapping. Trump's vow to take action against protesters targets those who commit violence against Tesla property, stating, "We catch anybody doing this because they're harming a great American company."

However, critics have raised concerns about the potential risks of Trump's move, particularly with regards to defining violence. There are fears that peaceful protesters could be labeled as violent in the future, and face deportation or other severe consequences. This concern is heightened by Trump's previous promise to deport international students who participate in protests against Israel's war in Gaza.

Musk's role in DOGE has been controversial, with critics accusing him of using his position to further his own business interests. His companies, including SpaceX, have received billions of dollars in government contracts and incentives, despite his efforts to slash government spending. The removal of entire agencies and widespread layoffs have sparked accusations of hypocrisy and cronyism.

Despite the controversy, Trump has expressed his support for Musk, stating, "I think he's been treated very unfairly by a very small group of people. And I just want people to know that he can't be penalized for being a patriot." The President also announced plans to purchase a Tesla, which he claims he won't be allowed to drive, but will be used by his staffers at the White House.

The implications of Trump's move are far-reaching, with potential consequences for freedom of speech, protest, and the role of government in regulating business. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the administration will define and enforce its stance on domestic terrorism, and what the long-term effects will be on Tesla, Musk, and the broader tech industry.