Meta's president of global affairs, Nick Clegg, has sounded the alarm on Elon Musk's growing influence on US politics, suggesting that the billionaire entrepreneur could potentially shape the country's political landscape for years to come. In a recent podcast interview with BBC's Nick Robinson, Clegg expressed concerns over Musk's role in the formation of the new US administration, likening him to a "puppet master" who could dictate the selection of Republican candidates.

Clegg's comments come at a time when Musk's political influence is increasingly under scrutiny. The SpaceX and Tesla CEO has been an outspoken supporter of Republican candidates, and his Twitter platform has become a powerful tool for shaping public opinion. Clegg warned that Musk's influence could go beyond mere support, potentially allowing him to handpick candidates and shape the political narrative.

While stopping short of labeling Musk a threat to democracy, Clegg emphasized that the billionaire's potential influence would be "quite different to the general tradition of American democracy." This sentiment echoes concerns raised by many experts, who argue that the concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals can undermine the democratic process.

Clegg's comments also highlight the complex relationship between tech giants and politics. As social media platforms continue to play an increasingly important role in shaping public opinion, the lines between tech and politics are becoming increasingly blurred. The influence of tech moguls like Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jack Dorsey on the political landscape is a topic of growing concern, with many calling for greater regulation and oversight.

The implications of Clegg's warnings are far-reaching. If Musk were to assume a more prominent role in shaping the Republican party's candidate selection, it could have significant consequences for the country's political landscape. The potential for a single individual to wield such influence raises important questions about the health of American democracy and the role of tech giants in shaping the country's political future.

In conclusion, Clegg's comments serve as a timely reminder of the need for greater scrutiny of the tech industry's influence on politics. As the boundaries between tech and politics continue to blur, it is essential that policymakers, experts, and citizens alike remain vigilant in ensuring that the democratic process remains intact. The warning signs are clear – it is up to us to heed them.