Elon Musk, the world's richest man, has made a surprise $97.4 billion offer to acquire OpenAI, the nonprofit artificial intelligence organization he co-founded. However, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman quickly dismissed the bid, taking to social media to publicly decline the offer.
The unsolicited takeover attempt, financed by Musk's AI company xAI and a consortium of outside investors, was revealed in a letter sent to California and Delaware's attorneys general. The move is seen as a strategic play by Musk, who is currently embroiled in a lawsuit with OpenAI alleging anticompetitive behavior.
Altman's rejection of the bid is more complicated than a simple "no thanks," according to corporate governance experts. OpenAI is in the process of restructuring from a nonprofit to a traditional for-profit company, specifically a public benefit corporation, to raise more capital. Musk's offer may have stalled this transition and raised the price of OpenAI's nonprofit, forcing the organization to consider outside bids seriously.
Delaware and California's attorneys general have requested more information from OpenAI about its plans to convert to a for-profit benefit corporation. The situation puts OpenAI's board in a tight spot, as they must demonstrate that they are not underselling the nonprofit's assets, including intellectual property from OpenAI's proprietary research, to an insider like Altman at a steep discount.
Musk's bid has signaled that there are investors willing to pay a premium for OpenAI's nonprofit wing, which is slated to receive a 25% stake in OpenAI's for-profit arm in a forthcoming funding round valuing the company at $260 billion. This puts pressure on OpenAI's board to carefully consider Musk's offer, despite the CEO's initial rejection.
Corporate law gives OpenAI's board significant authority to protect against unsolicited takeover bids. The organization could argue that Musk's bid is a hostile takeover attempt, given the history between Musk and Altman. Alternatively, OpenAI could challenge Musk's ability to finance the deal, as his wealth is largely tied to his Tesla stock.
OpenAI's board must also review Musk's offer to ensure it aligns with the nonprofit's mission to "ensure that artificial general intelligence – AI systems that are generally smarter than humans – benefits all of humanity." This could lead to a more thorough examination of Musk's intentions and the potential implications of his bid.
The fallout from Musk's offer is likely to be complex and far-reaching. If OpenAI's board sides with Altman, it could raise the potential market value of the nonprofit's assets, forcing the organization to raise more capital than anticipated and complicating talks with existing backers. This could also dilute the value of stakes held by OpenAI investors in the for-profit arm, including major partners like Microsoft.
In the end, Musk's bid has added a new layer of complexity to OpenAI's corporate restructuring plans, and the organization's next moves will be closely watched by the tech industry and investors alike.