Africa's venture capital ecosystem is facing a significant challenge due to a lack of accurate data, which is limiting transparency around exit decisions and hindering startup fundraising and growth. According to industry experts, the absence of reliable data is causing uncertainty around valuations and exit potentials, making it difficult for startups to secure funding and for investors to make informed decisions.
The primary issue lies in the dominance of secondary markets, where investors sell shares in startups to each other, rather than through initial public offerings (IPOs) or mergers and acquisitions. This has led to a willing-buyer, willing-seller model, where buyers often hold more leverage and offer to buy shares at significant discounts, sometimes reaching 40%. This can result in smaller funds struggling to meet return expectations, ultimately affecting the growth of African startups.
One example of this challenge is an early-stage pan-African VC firm that missed an opportunity to exit from a Kenyan digital commerce marketplace at a $100 million valuation before the startup's valuation fell to zero. Another early-stage firm sold secondaries at a fintech's recent fundraise, taking a 30% discount from the valuation. These valuation haircuts can make it difficult for smaller funds to meet LP return expectations, leading to a gap in funding for early-stage startups.
The lack of accurate data is a significant contributor to this problem. While annual funding raised is a useful metric, more impactful metrics such as the likelihood of finding a fund-returning startup at the early stage, average fund performance, or risk profiles across funding stages are either absent or difficult to obtain. This data gap is causing uncertainty around valuations and exit potentials, making it challenging for investors to make informed decisions.
However, there are potential solutions to this problem. Accurate and comprehensive data on historical exit multiples, sector-specific performance, stage-specific risk profiles, and regional comparables could provide benchmarks and reduce the valuation mismatch between early and later-stage investors. For instance, if data reveals that fintech exits in Nigeria typically achieve 5x returns, smaller VCs could negotiate better terms when selling secondaries in these fintechs.
Carta, a cap table management platform, has released a report providing data for America's VC industry, which has helped inform investment decisions, valuation standards, and portfolio strategies. Similarly, in Africa, building a robust data infrastructure could provide the necessary insights to improve the venture capital ecosystem.
However, building such an infrastructure requires patience, stakeholder buy-in, and significant capital. VC firms, LPs, and startup founders must be willing to share data while respecting confidentiality agreements, which can limit the amount of information they disclose. One potential workaround is focusing on sector-specific or regional data rather than individual company metrics.
Startups also have a crucial role to play in this process. They must be willing to report and benchmark their performance, which can foster the type of transparency that can help investors secure optimal returns on startup investment. This cultural shift can also help the ecosystem mature, as seen in the example of Stripe's annual letter, which has helped establish that AI startups are making more money than SaaS startups at the same stage of infancy.
In conclusion, the data gap in Africa's venture capital ecosystem is a significant challenge that must be addressed to improve transparency around exit decisions and support startup growth. By building a robust data infrastructure and fostering a culture of transparency, the ecosystem can mature, and investors can make more informed decisions. This, in turn, can lead to more funding opportunities for early-stage startups and ultimately drive the growth of Africa's startup ecosystem.